After some forty years of banking and investments, I retired in 2001. But since I do not golf, I soon found retirement to be very boring. So I decided to return to the investment world after ten months. However, those ten months were not a complete waste of time, for I had spent them in trying to utilize my forty years of investment experience to gain perspective on the most recent stock market "bubble" and subsequent "crash."
There were several people who saw the stock market crash coming, but they had different ideas as to when it would occur. Those who were too early had to suffer the derision of their peers. It was difficult to take a stand when so many were proclaiming that we were in a "new era" of investing and that the old rules no longer applied. Since the beginning of 1998 through the market high of March 2000, among 8,000 stock recommendations by Wall Street analysts, only 29 recommended "sell."
I am on record as having called for a cautious approach to investment two years before the "Crash of 2000." In an in-house investment newsletter dated April 1998, I have a picture of the "Titanic" with the caption: "Does anyone see any icebergs?"
When I resumed employment in 2002, I happened to glance at the chart on the last page of Value Line, which showed the stock market as having topped out, by coincidence, in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! The Value Line Composite Index reached a high of 508.39 on April 21, 1998 and has been lower EVER SINCE! But on the first page of the same issue, the date of the market high was given as "5-22-01"! When I contacted Value Line about this discrepancy , I was surprised to learn that they had changed their method of computing the index for "market highs" from "geometric" to "arithmetic." They said they would change the name of the Value Line "Composite" Index to the Value Line "Geometric" Index, since that is how it has been computed over the years. Currently Value Line is showing a recent market low on 10-9-02 and the most recent market high, based on this new "arithmetic" index, on 4-5-04, ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH! If they had stayed with the original "geometric" index, the all-time high would still be April 21, 1998!
Later that year, I was pleasantly surprised to read in "Barron's" an interview with Ned Davis, of Ned Davis Research, that said that his indicators had picked up on the bear market's beginnings in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! So, my instincts were correct! I believe that we are in a "secular" downturn that began in April 1998 and the "Bubble of 2000" was a market rally in what was already a long-term bear market.
Another development transpired soon after I resumed employment in 2002. I happened to notice one day that, in its "Market Laboratory," "Barron's" had inexplicably changed the P/E Ratio of the S&P 500 to 28.57 from 40.03 the previous week! This was due to a change to "operating" earnings of $39.28 from "net" or "reported " earnings of $28.31 the previous week. I and others wrote to "Barron's Mailbag" to complain about this change and to disagree with it, since these new P/E ratios could not be compared with historical P/Es. "Barron's apparently accepted our arguments and, about two months later, changed back to using "reported" earnings instead of "operating" earnings and revised the S&P 500 data to show a P/E Ratio of 45.09 compared to a previous week's 29.64.
But a similar problem occurred the next day in a sister publication to "Barron's." On April 9, 2002, "The Wall Street Journal" came out with a new format that included, for the first time, charts and data for the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 Index and Russell 2000, in addition to its own three Dow Jones indices. The P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 was given as 26, instead of the 45.09 now found in "Barron's." I wrote to the WSJ and after much correspondence back and forth, they finally accepted my argument and on July 29, 2002 changed the P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 from 19 to 30! I had given them examples showing where some financial writers had inadvertently confused "apples" with "oranges" by comparing their P/E of 19, based on "operating" earnings, with the long-term average P/E of 16, based on "reported" earnings.
Because I started to be cautious about investing as early as April 1998, since I thought that price/earnings ratios for the stock market were perilously high, I was not hurt personally by the "Crash of 2000" and had tried to get my clients into less aggressive and more liquid positions in their investment portfolios. But the pressures to go along with the market were tremendous!
Price/earnings ratios do not enable us to "time the market." But comparing them to past historical performance does enable us to tell when a stock market is high and vulnerable to eventual correction, even though others around us may have lost their bearings. High P/Es alert us to a need for caution and a conservative approach in our investment decisions, such as a renewed emphasis on dividends. Very high P/Es usually indicate a long-term bear market may ensue for a very long period of time. We are apparently in such a long-term bear market now. But in determining whether the market is high, we must be vigilant with regard to what data mambers of the financial press are reporting to us, so we can compare "apples" with "apples." When the financial information does not appear to be correct, we, as financial analysts, owe it to the investment community to challenge such information. That is what I have concluded from my personal "odyssey" in the investment world.
After three years of the DJIA and the S&P 500 closing below their previous year-end figures, the market finally closed higher at the end of 2003. But the P/E ratio is still high for both indices.
Does anyone see any icebergs?
Henry V. Janoski, MBA, CFA, CSA is a 1955 graduate 'magna cum laude" of Yale University and a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He received his MBA in finance and banking from the Wharton Graduate Business School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1960 and holds the professional designations of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and Certified Senior Advisor (CSA). As a registered investment advisor representative with the title of Senior Investment Officer, he is located in Scranton, PA. His biography is listed in "Who's Who in Finance and Industry" and in "Who's Who in America." E-mail address: hjanoski@aol.com
efficient cleaning crew Northbrook ..The greatest stock market myth is the idea that investing... Read More
"If you don't know where you are going, any road... Read More
Alfred Winslow Jones started hedge funds in 1949. He was... Read More
Ever jumped out of an airplane? It's OK if you... Read More
This is a rather simple strategy with which I am... Read More
Because you don't feel too sure about which stock or... Read More
The Shadow knows. Remember him? It seems a shadow has... Read More
If you have not back tested your trading system, you... Read More
Stock investment advice is easy to find. Do you get... Read More
On Monday, November 25, 2000 Investor's Business Daily listed on... Read More
How do you invest? What do you really pay? At... Read More
To begin, you might look at playing the stock market... Read More
Every day I hear someone on CNBC proclaim that "this... Read More
You remember (they show it on TV every year) the... Read More
If you're a normal human being, your need to feel... Read More
AS BUILDERS BEGIN WORK ON THE FREEDOM TOWER in New... Read More
There is a current movie entitled "Eternal Sunshine of the... Read More
Professional stock options traders use the term lean to refer... Read More
The Winter Games for the Olympics are coming up soon... Read More
If there is one term over-used when talking about making... Read More
As an investor you will want to check out any... Read More
Stock trading remains a very competitive field and the stock... Read More
Let's assume that you want to make some serious money... Read More
There are many good penny stock investments available, which could... Read More
Duck! No I don't mean a quack, quack. I meant... Read More
cleaning lady near Wilmette ..Most stock market traders have a favorite technical indicator.The one... Read More
Jack and Jill went up the hill to fetch a... Read More
Investors who exclusively use broadly diversified, no load mutual funds... Read More
Profitable day traders recognize that momentum trading is among the... Read More
Intervention. Now don't let that big word scare you. The... Read More
Every stock market investor faces one primal enemy. An enemy... Read More
Being wrong is OK, but let's not carry it to... Read More
The greatest stock market myth is the idea that investing... Read More
Are hedge funds a suitable investment for you? Hedge funds... Read More
Do you have a nest egg? You know, a place... Read More
With all the bad news that has been dumped upon... Read More
One of the basic laws of physics is that a... Read More
Are you paying any attention to your retirement savings? Do... Read More
Hedge current portfolio positions and gain access to capital resources... Read More
There is so much involved in developing peak performance, that... Read More
On Friday or Saturday evening my wife gets a movie... Read More
Maximizing a stock market investmentThere are several factors an investor... Read More
Let's go into the details of why non-indexed mutual funds... Read More
A colleague of mine just returned from a scuba diving... Read More
Every year I go to the Money Show in Orlando,... Read More
Using Swing Trading Strategies and Technical Analysis when Trading Stocks... Read More
Did you run out to buy that duct tape yet?... Read More
I am taking the time to help others learn the... Read More
Disclaimer: Please note that I do not necessarily purchase, own,... Read More
Investing in long-term financial vehicles give you the most gains... Read More
Stocks & Mutual Fund |