After some forty years of banking and investments, I retired in 2001. But since I do not golf, I soon found retirement to be very boring. So I decided to return to the investment world after ten months. However, those ten months were not a complete waste of time, for I had spent them in trying to utilize my forty years of investment experience to gain perspective on the most recent stock market "bubble" and subsequent "crash."
There were several people who saw the stock market crash coming, but they had different ideas as to when it would occur. Those who were too early had to suffer the derision of their peers. It was difficult to take a stand when so many were proclaiming that we were in a "new era" of investing and that the old rules no longer applied. Since the beginning of 1998 through the market high of March 2000, among 8,000 stock recommendations by Wall Street analysts, only 29 recommended "sell."
I am on record as having called for a cautious approach to investment two years before the "Crash of 2000." In an in-house investment newsletter dated April 1998, I have a picture of the "Titanic" with the caption: "Does anyone see any icebergs?"
When I resumed employment in 2002, I happened to glance at the chart on the last page of Value Line, which showed the stock market as having topped out, by coincidence, in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! The Value Line Composite Index reached a high of 508.39 on April 21, 1998 and has been lower EVER SINCE! But on the first page of the same issue, the date of the market high was given as "5-22-01"! When I contacted Value Line about this discrepancy , I was surprised to learn that they had changed their method of computing the index for "market highs" from "geometric" to "arithmetic." They said they would change the name of the Value Line "Composite" Index to the Value Line "Geometric" Index, since that is how it has been computed over the years. Currently Value Line is showing a recent market low on 10-9-02 and the most recent market high, based on this new "arithmetic" index, on 4-5-04, ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH! If they had stayed with the original "geometric" index, the all-time high would still be April 21, 1998!
Later that year, I was pleasantly surprised to read in "Barron's" an interview with Ned Davis, of Ned Davis Research, that said that his indicators had picked up on the bear market's beginnings in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! So, my instincts were correct! I believe that we are in a "secular" downturn that began in April 1998 and the "Bubble of 2000" was a market rally in what was already a long-term bear market.
Another development transpired soon after I resumed employment in 2002. I happened to notice one day that, in its "Market Laboratory," "Barron's" had inexplicably changed the P/E Ratio of the S&P 500 to 28.57 from 40.03 the previous week! This was due to a change to "operating" earnings of $39.28 from "net" or "reported " earnings of $28.31 the previous week. I and others wrote to "Barron's Mailbag" to complain about this change and to disagree with it, since these new P/E ratios could not be compared with historical P/Es. "Barron's apparently accepted our arguments and, about two months later, changed back to using "reported" earnings instead of "operating" earnings and revised the S&P 500 data to show a P/E Ratio of 45.09 compared to a previous week's 29.64.
But a similar problem occurred the next day in a sister publication to "Barron's." On April 9, 2002, "The Wall Street Journal" came out with a new format that included, for the first time, charts and data for the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 Index and Russell 2000, in addition to its own three Dow Jones indices. The P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 was given as 26, instead of the 45.09 now found in "Barron's." I wrote to the WSJ and after much correspondence back and forth, they finally accepted my argument and on July 29, 2002 changed the P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 from 19 to 30! I had given them examples showing where some financial writers had inadvertently confused "apples" with "oranges" by comparing their P/E of 19, based on "operating" earnings, with the long-term average P/E of 16, based on "reported" earnings.
Because I started to be cautious about investing as early as April 1998, since I thought that price/earnings ratios for the stock market were perilously high, I was not hurt personally by the "Crash of 2000" and had tried to get my clients into less aggressive and more liquid positions in their investment portfolios. But the pressures to go along with the market were tremendous!
Price/earnings ratios do not enable us to "time the market." But comparing them to past historical performance does enable us to tell when a stock market is high and vulnerable to eventual correction, even though others around us may have lost their bearings. High P/Es alert us to a need for caution and a conservative approach in our investment decisions, such as a renewed emphasis on dividends. Very high P/Es usually indicate a long-term bear market may ensue for a very long period of time. We are apparently in such a long-term bear market now. But in determining whether the market is high, we must be vigilant with regard to what data mambers of the financial press are reporting to us, so we can compare "apples" with "apples." When the financial information does not appear to be correct, we, as financial analysts, owe it to the investment community to challenge such information. That is what I have concluded from my personal "odyssey" in the investment world.
After three years of the DJIA and the S&P 500 closing below their previous year-end figures, the market finally closed higher at the end of 2003. But the P/E ratio is still high for both indices.
Does anyone see any icebergs?
Henry V. Janoski, MBA, CFA, CSA is a 1955 graduate 'magna cum laude" of Yale University and a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He received his MBA in finance and banking from the Wharton Graduate Business School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1960 and holds the professional designations of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and Certified Senior Advisor (CSA). As a registered investment advisor representative with the title of Senior Investment Officer, he is located in Scranton, PA. His biography is listed in "Who's Who in Finance and Industry" and in "Who's Who in America." E-mail address: hjanoski@aol.com
Ashton group transportation logistics management ..Now that you have some money burning a hole in... Read More
One of the main reasons many of us get into... Read More
Congress recently passed another new law that is supposed to... Read More
Yesterday I received my monthly issue of MONEY magazine. This... Read More
Most people think the stock market is a zero sum... Read More
You'd have had to be living on a desert island... Read More
Everyone who follows the financial news has heard of mutual... Read More
Right now there doesn't seem to be any "gold fever".... Read More
Duck! No I don't mean a quack, quack. I meant... Read More
You remember (they show it on TV every year) the... Read More
The trash business in its efforts to cook their books... Read More
It is wonderful to be alive in the information age.... Read More
Have you seen all those big full page ads for... Read More
Money management starts with protecting your capital, realizing profits and... Read More
The Winter Games for the Olympics are coming up soon... Read More
Picture one of those clubs where only the real heavyweights... Read More
I cringe every time I hear a novice investor tell... Read More
There is a current movie entitled "Eternal Sunshine of the... Read More
A colleague of mine just returned from a scuba diving... Read More
I am hearing predictions by brokers, financial planners, talk show... Read More
I feel that an investment strategy in the stock market... Read More
Fundamental analysis.Fundamentals analysis says the best way to predict the... Read More
I mean it when I say that. While plastic silverware... Read More
Both the stock market and oil prices rallied recently, which... Read More
One of the great truisms of Wall Street is "Don't... Read More
group transportation logistics management Highland ..I love roller coasters. The steeper the better. High and... Read More
I'll bet with almost anyone that has stocks or mutual... Read More
One of the great "secrets" of successful people is discipline... Read More
When you invest in the stock market for ever-increasing cash... Read More
Trading is a fascinating activity.There are so many layers to... Read More
The single most expensive stock market trades are those made... Read More
The Macedonian Stock Exchange (MSE) is not operating successfully. True,... Read More
If you are fed up with early redemption charges and... Read More
Just about everything you have been told about Social Security... Read More
The bulls and bears of the stock market are both... Read More
One of the great truisms of Wall Street is "Don't... Read More
TOO OFTEN, INVESTORS SIMPLY CHOOSE TO follow the crowd. This... Read More
Every day in any financial publication you will find the... Read More
Let's assume that you want to make some serious money... Read More
You have a lock on your house. You have a... Read More
04/28/2005NASDAQ dropped -12.5% year to date in 2005. S&P500 index... Read More
I cringe every time I hear a novice investor tell... Read More
You have decided to buy some stock or mutual funds,... Read More
In a previously written article, we expanded the use of... Read More
Ever have one of those sample boxes of candy? Each... Read More
Regardless of the fact that the world's stock markets have... Read More
Fundamental analysis.Fundamentals analysis says the best way to predict the... Read More
For the year 2000 we have seen hundreds of mutual... Read More
I would like to share with the reader an article... Read More
The big bad bear is stirring again. So far he... Read More
Stocks & Mutual Fund |